I immediately knew that you meant "underwear from a certain historical era" and not "underwear that I wear when it's that time of the month". I'm not sure what this says about me, though.
OTOH, it could have been worse if you hadn't been able to find your underwear, period.
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
branchandroot
no subject
Date: 2010-05-19 07:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-19 08:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-19 08:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-19 08:13 pm (UTC)I did find one pair ... though not the pair I took to Pittsburgh two weeks ago.
Oh, house. Why are you so frustrating?
no subject
Date: 2010-05-19 10:55 pm (UTC)(How would I know about such things???) :)
no subject
Date: 2010-05-20 03:49 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-20 01:52 pm (UTC)Still, I'm not sure "crappier underwear" is all that much better.
And, I'll think I'll remove myself from further discussion on this, uh, topic. ;) Bound to get my self in deeper and that ain't a good idea....
no subject
Date: 2010-05-20 03:43 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-20 03:48 am (UTC)If anything I call it my crappier underwear - which is also ambiguous!
But I wouldn't blog about it, anyway.
no subject
Date: 2010-05-20 04:17 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-20 04:28 am (UTC)OTOH, it could have been worse if you hadn't been able to find your underwear, period.
no subject
Date: 2010-05-20 03:21 pm (UTC)But as for you, it says that you understand that even TMI queens like me know better than to blog about THAT.